Bluwat Chemicals applies controlled laboratory procedures to evaluate the identity, consistency and handling performance of anionic and nonionic polyacrylamide before batch release. This quality-control framework is developed with reference to GB/T 17514-2017 and is supported by internal sampling, instrument calibration, reagent control, duplicate testing and record-review procedures.
The methods below explain how the tests are performed. Product acceptance values are managed in grade-specific inspection plans, customer-agreed specifications and release documents and are therefore not reproduced on this page.
Checks the physical condition, uniformity and cleanliness of the supplied polymer.
Uses dilute-solution viscometry to evaluate the polymer-chain characteristics of the PAM grade.
Determines the mass remaining after controlled drying to constant mass.
Measures the anionic functionality of applicable grades by a standardized colloid-titration procedure.
Tracks conductivity during controlled dissolution and records the time required to reach a stable endpoint.
Uses controlled mechanical sieving to quantify coarse and fine fractions.
Separates, dries and weighs material that remains after extended dissolution.
Reliable results begin with a representative sample. For solid PAM, sampling points are distributed across the selected packaging units. The sampler is inserted vertically into the material so that product is collected from below the surface rather than only from the top layer. The increments are combined, mixed and reduced by quartering to obtain the laboratory sample.
The final sample is placed in clean, dry and tightly sealed containers. Each container is identified with the product name, grade, batch number, sampling date and sampler. One portion is used for testing and a separately sealed portion is retained for traceability. PAM is hygroscopic, so unnecessary exposure to ambient humidity is avoided during sampling, weighing and storage.
A representative portion is spread in a clean, dry tray and inspected under uniform lighting. The analyst records the physical form, color uniformity, particle consistency, visible agglomeration, foreign material and any sign of moisture pickup or package contamination.
Appearance inspection is not used as a substitute for laboratory measurement. It is an initial identity and handling check that helps identify abnormal storage, damaged packaging or cross-contamination before instrumental testing begins.
PAM increases the flow time of a dilute sodium chloride solution through an Ubbelohde viscometer. The solvent flow time and polymer-solution flow time are used to calculate relative viscosity, specific viscosity and intrinsic viscosity. Relative molecular mass is then derived from the validated Mark-Houwink relationship for the method.
The clean, dry viscometer is placed vertically in the constant-temperature bath with the measuring bulb immersed. Filtered sodium chloride solution is introduced to the specified filling marks and allowed to equilibrate for 10-15 min. The liquid is drawn above the upper timing mark and released. The time required for the meniscus to pass between the timing marks is measured three times. Closely agreeing readings are averaged to obtain the solvent flow time, t0.
A test portion equivalent to about 0.02 g on a dry basis is weighed to 0.2 mg in a dry beaker. It is dissolved with sodium chloride solution without introducing undissolved fisheyes, transferred quantitatively to a 100 mL volumetric flask, diluted to volume with the same solvent and mixed thoroughly. The concentration is adjusted so that the polymer-to-solvent flow-time ratio is between 1.2 and 2.0, keeping the measurement within the method's working interval.
The polymer solution is equilibrated and measured using the same viscometer procedure to obtain t1. The relative viscosity and specific viscosity are calculated as follows:
In these equations, c is the dry-basis polymer concentration in g/dL, [η] is intrinsic viscosity, M is relative molecular mass, and K and α are the constants specified in the approved method. Duplicate results are reviewed for repeatability before the value is reported.
A known mass of PAM is dried under controlled conditions until constant mass is reached. The remaining dry mass is expressed as a percentage of the original test portion.
Parallel determinations are performed, and the arithmetic mean is reported after the repeatability check is satisfied.
The anionic groups in a dissolved PAM sample react with a known amount of methyl glycol chitosan under alkaline conditions. The excess cationic reagent is titrated with standardized potassium polyvinyl sulfate solution using toluidine blue as the endpoint indicator. A reagent blank is tested in parallel, and the blank-corrected titrant consumption is used to calculate the anionic degree.
The potassium polyvinyl sulfate titrant is standardized against a accurately weighed cetylpyridinium chloride reference solution. An aliquot of the reference solution is diluted, adjusted to pH 3.5-4.5 and treated with toluidine blue. The titration proceeds to the specified blue-to-purple endpoint. A blank is run under the same conditions, and the blank correction is included when calculating the exact titrant concentration.
Water is placed in a 500 mL beaker and stirred until a stable vortex forms. Approximately 1 g of PAM is added slowly and uniformly into the vortex to prevent agglomeration. Stirring continues until the polymer is completely dissolved and the total prepared solution mass is recorded.
A weighed portion of the prepared PAM solution is transferred to a 250 mL conical flask and diluted with 100 mL water. The pH is adjusted to 10.4-10.6. A 5 mL aliquot of methyl glycol chitosan solution and three drops of toluidine blue indicator are added. The mixture is titrated with standardized potassium polyvinyl sulfate until the solution changes from blue to purple. A blank determination is performed at the same time.
The anionic degree is calculated from the blank-corrected titrant volume, the exact titrant concentration, sample-solution mass, total prepared mass, measured solid fraction and the stoichiometric relationship defined in the approved calculation sheet. Duplicate determinations and endpoint consistency are reviewed before reporting.
The conductivity of water increases as PAM dissolves. When the polymer has fully dissolved under controlled mixing and temperature conditions, the conductivity reaches a stable value. The elapsed time from sample addition to a stable conductivity reading is recorded as the dissolution time.
The time from sample addition to the stable endpoint is reported in minutes. The analyst also records any fisheyes, floating agglomerates, wall deposits or abnormal solution behavior observed during the test.
A 200 mm diameter sieve assembly is prepared with a receiving pan, a 180 µm sieve and a 1.00 mm sieve. The sieves are clean, dry and pre-weighed. A mechanical sieve shaker operating at approximately 350 cycles per minute is used.
Separate results are recorded for the material retained on the 1.00 mm sieve and the material retained on the 180 µm sieve.
A known mass of PAM is dissolved for an extended period under controlled stirring. The solution is passed through a pre-cleaned and pre-weighed stainless-steel screen. The retained material is washed, dried to constant mass and weighed.
Here, m0 is the original sample mass. Parallel determinations are completed and reviewed before the result is entered in the batch record.
Each test record includes the sample identity, batch number, test date, analyst, instrument identification, calibration status, reagent identity, raw observations, calculations and duplicate-test review. Unexpected results trigger a documented investigation and, when appropriate, resampling and retesting under the approved procedure.
The laboratory result is reviewed against the applicable Bluwat product specification, purchase contract and customer-specific requirements. Only reviewed data are used for batch disposition and the final Certificate of Analysis.
Moisture affects the apparent concentration of active polymer. Dry-basis calculations allow test results to be compared consistently between samples and batches.
The controlled ionic-strength medium reduces variability caused by electrostatic expansion of charged polymer chains and supports a more reproducible viscosity measurement.
Conductivity provides a continuous, instrument-based signal as the polymer hydrates and dissolves. A stable reading under fixed temperature and mixing conditions provides a consistent endpoint.
No. Laboratory quality tests confirm product consistency, while treatment performance also depends on wastewater chemistry, pH, suspended solids, mixing conditions and dosage. A jar test with the actual water is recommended for grade selection and process optimization.
The core principles are consistent, but the applicable test set and calculation details depend on whether the product is anionic or nonionic and on the agreed grade specification. The laboratory follows the approved inspection plan for the batch being tested.
This article is a practical overview of Bluwat Chemicals' quality-control approach for anionic and nonionic water-treatment polyacrylamide, developed with reference to GB/T 17514-2017. It is intended to explain the testing workflow and does not replace the full standard, a controlled laboratory SOP, a product specification or a customer contract.
Bluwat Chemicals applies controlled laboratory procedures to evaluate the identity, consistency and handling performance of anionic and nonionic polyacrylamide before batch release. This quality-control framework is developed with reference to GB/T 17514-2017 and is supported by internal sampling, instrument calibration, reagent control, duplicate testing and record-review procedures.
The methods below explain how the tests are performed. Product acceptance values are managed in grade-specific inspection plans, customer-agreed specifications and release documents and are therefore not reproduced on this page.
Checks the physical condition, uniformity and cleanliness of the supplied polymer.
Uses dilute-solution viscometry to evaluate the polymer-chain characteristics of the PAM grade.
Determines the mass remaining after controlled drying to constant mass.
Measures the anionic functionality of applicable grades by a standardized colloid-titration procedure.
Tracks conductivity during controlled dissolution and records the time required to reach a stable endpoint.
Uses controlled mechanical sieving to quantify coarse and fine fractions.
Separates, dries and weighs material that remains after extended dissolution.
Reliable results begin with a representative sample. For solid PAM, sampling points are distributed across the selected packaging units. The sampler is inserted vertically into the material so that product is collected from below the surface rather than only from the top layer. The increments are combined, mixed and reduced by quartering to obtain the laboratory sample.
The final sample is placed in clean, dry and tightly sealed containers. Each container is identified with the product name, grade, batch number, sampling date and sampler. One portion is used for testing and a separately sealed portion is retained for traceability. PAM is hygroscopic, so unnecessary exposure to ambient humidity is avoided during sampling, weighing and storage.
A representative portion is spread in a clean, dry tray and inspected under uniform lighting. The analyst records the physical form, color uniformity, particle consistency, visible agglomeration, foreign material and any sign of moisture pickup or package contamination.
Appearance inspection is not used as a substitute for laboratory measurement. It is an initial identity and handling check that helps identify abnormal storage, damaged packaging or cross-contamination before instrumental testing begins.
PAM increases the flow time of a dilute sodium chloride solution through an Ubbelohde viscometer. The solvent flow time and polymer-solution flow time are used to calculate relative viscosity, specific viscosity and intrinsic viscosity. Relative molecular mass is then derived from the validated Mark-Houwink relationship for the method.
The clean, dry viscometer is placed vertically in the constant-temperature bath with the measuring bulb immersed. Filtered sodium chloride solution is introduced to the specified filling marks and allowed to equilibrate for 10-15 min. The liquid is drawn above the upper timing mark and released. The time required for the meniscus to pass between the timing marks is measured three times. Closely agreeing readings are averaged to obtain the solvent flow time, t0.
A test portion equivalent to about 0.02 g on a dry basis is weighed to 0.2 mg in a dry beaker. It is dissolved with sodium chloride solution without introducing undissolved fisheyes, transferred quantitatively to a 100 mL volumetric flask, diluted to volume with the same solvent and mixed thoroughly. The concentration is adjusted so that the polymer-to-solvent flow-time ratio is between 1.2 and 2.0, keeping the measurement within the method's working interval.
The polymer solution is equilibrated and measured using the same viscometer procedure to obtain t1. The relative viscosity and specific viscosity are calculated as follows:
In these equations, c is the dry-basis polymer concentration in g/dL, [η] is intrinsic viscosity, M is relative molecular mass, and K and α are the constants specified in the approved method. Duplicate results are reviewed for repeatability before the value is reported.
A known mass of PAM is dried under controlled conditions until constant mass is reached. The remaining dry mass is expressed as a percentage of the original test portion.
Parallel determinations are performed, and the arithmetic mean is reported after the repeatability check is satisfied.
The anionic groups in a dissolved PAM sample react with a known amount of methyl glycol chitosan under alkaline conditions. The excess cationic reagent is titrated with standardized potassium polyvinyl sulfate solution using toluidine blue as the endpoint indicator. A reagent blank is tested in parallel, and the blank-corrected titrant consumption is used to calculate the anionic degree.
The potassium polyvinyl sulfate titrant is standardized against a accurately weighed cetylpyridinium chloride reference solution. An aliquot of the reference solution is diluted, adjusted to pH 3.5-4.5 and treated with toluidine blue. The titration proceeds to the specified blue-to-purple endpoint. A blank is run under the same conditions, and the blank correction is included when calculating the exact titrant concentration.
Water is placed in a 500 mL beaker and stirred until a stable vortex forms. Approximately 1 g of PAM is added slowly and uniformly into the vortex to prevent agglomeration. Stirring continues until the polymer is completely dissolved and the total prepared solution mass is recorded.
A weighed portion of the prepared PAM solution is transferred to a 250 mL conical flask and diluted with 100 mL water. The pH is adjusted to 10.4-10.6. A 5 mL aliquot of methyl glycol chitosan solution and three drops of toluidine blue indicator are added. The mixture is titrated with standardized potassium polyvinyl sulfate until the solution changes from blue to purple. A blank determination is performed at the same time.
The anionic degree is calculated from the blank-corrected titrant volume, the exact titrant concentration, sample-solution mass, total prepared mass, measured solid fraction and the stoichiometric relationship defined in the approved calculation sheet. Duplicate determinations and endpoint consistency are reviewed before reporting.
The conductivity of water increases as PAM dissolves. When the polymer has fully dissolved under controlled mixing and temperature conditions, the conductivity reaches a stable value. The elapsed time from sample addition to a stable conductivity reading is recorded as the dissolution time.
The time from sample addition to the stable endpoint is reported in minutes. The analyst also records any fisheyes, floating agglomerates, wall deposits or abnormal solution behavior observed during the test.
A 200 mm diameter sieve assembly is prepared with a receiving pan, a 180 µm sieve and a 1.00 mm sieve. The sieves are clean, dry and pre-weighed. A mechanical sieve shaker operating at approximately 350 cycles per minute is used.
Separate results are recorded for the material retained on the 1.00 mm sieve and the material retained on the 180 µm sieve.
A known mass of PAM is dissolved for an extended period under controlled stirring. The solution is passed through a pre-cleaned and pre-weighed stainless-steel screen. The retained material is washed, dried to constant mass and weighed.
Here, m0 is the original sample mass. Parallel determinations are completed and reviewed before the result is entered in the batch record.
Each test record includes the sample identity, batch number, test date, analyst, instrument identification, calibration status, reagent identity, raw observations, calculations and duplicate-test review. Unexpected results trigger a documented investigation and, when appropriate, resampling and retesting under the approved procedure.
The laboratory result is reviewed against the applicable Bluwat product specification, purchase contract and customer-specific requirements. Only reviewed data are used for batch disposition and the final Certificate of Analysis.
Moisture affects the apparent concentration of active polymer. Dry-basis calculations allow test results to be compared consistently between samples and batches.
The controlled ionic-strength medium reduces variability caused by electrostatic expansion of charged polymer chains and supports a more reproducible viscosity measurement.
Conductivity provides a continuous, instrument-based signal as the polymer hydrates and dissolves. A stable reading under fixed temperature and mixing conditions provides a consistent endpoint.
No. Laboratory quality tests confirm product consistency, while treatment performance also depends on wastewater chemistry, pH, suspended solids, mixing conditions and dosage. A jar test with the actual water is recommended for grade selection and process optimization.
The core principles are consistent, but the applicable test set and calculation details depend on whether the product is anionic or nonionic and on the agreed grade specification. The laboratory follows the approved inspection plan for the batch being tested.
This article is a practical overview of Bluwat Chemicals' quality-control approach for anionic and nonionic water-treatment polyacrylamide, developed with reference to GB/T 17514-2017. It is intended to explain the testing workflow and does not replace the full standard, a controlled laboratory SOP, a product specification or a customer contract.